Cherisma v. State, ___ So. 3d ___, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D1050 (Fla. 3d DCA April 30, 2012)
The State called the investigating detective as a witness during its case in chief. During cross examination, defense counsel established “inconsistencies between the victim’s initial and subsequent account of the details” of the crime. On redirect examination, the detective testified over objection … Click To Read Full Case Law Review...