Buitrago v. Feaster, ___ So. 3d ___, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D81 (Fla. 2d DCA December 31, 2014)
The jury in a motor vehicle negligence case awarded damages to the plaintiff for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and past noneconomic damages but awarded nothing for future noneconomic damages. The plaintiff moved for a new trial on future noneconomic damages, contending that an award of future noneconomic damages was compulsory based upon the finding that the plaintiff sustained a permanent injury. The trial court granted the motion without explanation. As a result, the appellate felt compelled to conclude that the trial court’s ruling was based upon the plaintiff’s argument, which was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court in Allstate Insurance Company v. Manasse, 707 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1998). The trial court should have determined whether the verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, but the plaintiff did not base its motion upon this standard, and the trial court failed to consider it. As a result, the appellate court remanded for reconsideration based upon the correct legal standard.
To read more briefs in the Torts: Negligence category of the Kashi Law Letter, please click here, http://www.kashilawletter.com/category/torts/negligence/.
To read more briefs in the Trial: Verdicts category of the Kashi Law Letter, please click here, http://www.kashilawletter.com/category/trial/verdicts/.
To read more briefs in the Evidence category of the Kashi Law Letter, please click here, http://www.kashilawletter.com/category/evidence/.
To read more briefs in the Appeals category of the Kashi Law Letter, please click here, http://www.kashilawletter.com/category/appeals/.